Voters Of Massachusetts Don’t Want A Man Who Voted Against Rape Kits For Assaulted Women!

January 272010

http://MOXNews.com/
January 17, 2010 News Corp

Duration : 0:7:4


[youtube d4KX5qJcKqU]

25 Responses

  1. Idiotsasusual Says:

    She’s a lying …
    She’s a lying bitch, figures though. Brown did not vote against rape kits. He DID vote against religious people being forced to provide emergency contraception. The fact is though, that’s not a big deal. The number of hospitals/employees that are willing to provide that service, outnumber the ones who are not willing to. If that dumb doesn’t know the difference between a rape kit, and contraceptives, she shouldn’t be talking about the election at all.

  2. joshuag5732 Says:

    2 against one. …
    2 against one. That’s fair.

  3. DolphinFilms Says:

    “Always vote for …
    “Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.”

    - John Quincy Adams

  4. DominoChild Says:

    still don’t know …
    still don’t know who i’m going to vote for yet

  5. bamboozlewatch Says:

    How can they be …
    How can they be fake when they post news? Are you saying FOX isn’t news… I see your point.

  6. QWERTY34990 Says:

    ALEART!!! (Mox News …
    ALEART!!! (Mox News) is a FAKE!!! like Coakley

  7. bamboozlewatch Says:

    The rape kit line …
    The rape kit line comes in at 4.44 of the video.

  8. bamboozlewatch Says:

    No thanks Qwerty, …
    No thanks Qwerty, MOX News works fine.

  9. QWERTY34990 Says:

    ALERT !!! Go to Fox …
    ALERT !!! Go to Fox News not (Mox News) dont wast your time here.

  10. whoo689 Says:

    And what’s with …
    And what’s with this attitude among many voters and legislators that just about anyone can be an effective legislator? Martha Coakley may or may not have been a good AG, but that doesn’t necessariliy mean she’ll be a good Senator. There’s a clear diff. between the 2 offices, esp. when state Cabinets usually are partisan and have people VOTE for them, not appointed. It’s like when people put faith in Jay Nixon and thought 16 years of AG was all he needed to be an effective governor here.

  11. whoo689 Says:

    Isn’t it funny how …
    Isn’t it funny how they didn’t invite a Congressman from MASSACHUSETTS here to talk about the MASSACHUSETTS Senate race? They had some guy from CA and another from Florida, 2 of the farthest states from MA. Wouldn’t it be relevant to have at least one person from the state the race is IN comment?

  12. whoo689 Says:

    Lol@how biased the …
    Lol@how biased the host obviously is. Giving the Republican softball questions and tougher ones for the Democrat. What’s new?

    That was pretty rude for him to start asking a question of the other guest before she was done talking. And the way he looked frustrated with her like “Oh, my god. finish already.” And then ‘explaining’ Brown’s vote in a very angry tone.

  13. EscpdFrmPsykward Says:

    Just like any …
    Just like any nation with a public insurance plan… Canada, Britain… There’s nothing you can do to get them to give up the healthcare system they have. Voters would only vote to make it better, not to scale it back by any degree.

  14. dustinjt Says:

    @Bunnicula71 Yea …
    @Bunnicula71 Yea that was ridiculous. He’s clearly a GOP puppet and not an unbiased news reporter. She’s bringing up points about why he wouldn’t be a good candidate for Mass., and he’s just says, “Wait, he would deny that.” C’mon.

    And the answer she couldn’t answer, why the race has tightend, it’s because Coakley and the Democratic Party arrogantly assumed the seat was guaranteed for them, so they weren’t campaigning.

  15. mojdfiv Says:

    I think people need …
    I think people need to start voting 3rd party and forget the bought out Republicans and Democrats.

  16. dustinjt Says:

    The guy on the left …
    The guy on the left is so lifeless. I honestly thought he was a photograph until he started talking. Then I KNEW he was just a photograph.

  17. OneCourageous Says:

    who cares we have …
    who cares we have checks and balances if Ohio wants to go bankrupt let them but Massachuttess shouldnt be forced to subsidize other states just because. They already have their healthcare and they dont want it to change Thats why we have congress set the way we do.

  18. ReliableInsider Says:

    Fox “News” should …
    Fox “News” should try taking a real health care reform poll and ask Republican voters how they come down on lower premiums for the same health care.

    Which is the whole point of health care reform.

  19. southparkgtaca Says:

    And News Corp.
    And News Corp.

  20. bigc028282 Says:

    It’s better than …
    It’s better than the retards in majority now, that love Kinsey and Crowley.
    I guess we’re back to picking the better than what we’re getting, AGAIN. Try not to vote for RepubliCONS, when your replacing the DemoNUTS.

    There should be a disclaimer on the “news”. “Brought to you by one of the 6 corps, like G.E., that make more off of agenda’s than providing news and facts.

  21. Bunnicula71 Says:

    The FUX news puppet …
    The FUX news puppet interrupted her very rudely.

    Please Mass, don’t elect a douchebag republican. . . wait that statement is redundant.

    This network is a complete fuckin’ joke. I think they are doing seances where they conjure the spirit of Joe Goebbels to tell them how to lie, decieve, and spin more effectively.

  22. LifeIsGood63 Says:

    Massachesetts has …
    Massachesetts has the highest per capita of rich people right? Just wondering if they are suffering like lets say Ohio?

  23. grifonecoronato Says:

    She wasn’t making …
    She wasn’t making it up; Massachusetts has its own public insurance plan.

    Whether it’s an *efficient* insurance plan is debatable, but there is no denying the state has taken a positive step forward.

    Conservatives will try to argue that because the Mass plan has its flaws it ought to be scrapped. But I highly doubt Mass voters will agree with that course of action: to revise the plan and improve upon its flaws, sure. But to vote for anyone who wishes to dismantle it seems unlikely to me.

  24. medallish Says:

    I’ve seen this host …
    I’ve seen this host before, is it just me or is he among the most annoying conservatives at fox?(like there’s anything else) I mean his counterpoints was so weak, when he was trying to counter her point.

  25. ragenut2112 Says:

    As a proud …
    As a proud independent progressive Masshole, I’m voting Coakley ONLY to Keep Brownie from getting in. Diarrhea, stool? Either way it’s still shit.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

|